Daily Archives: 4 May, 2012

Simple blood test to detect Breast cancer

The possibility of developing a simple blood test to help identify women most at risk from breast cancer has been raised after researchers discovered a strong association between risk of the disease and a molecular change in a particular white blood cell gene.

Scientists funded by the Breast Cancer Campaign analysed blood samples from 1,380 women of various ages, 640 of whom went on to develop breast cancer.

They found a strong association between molecular modification of a white blood cell gene called ATM and breast cancer risk.

The scientists looked for evidence of a chemical effect called methylation, which “switches” genes on and off.

Women showing the highest methylation levels affecting the ATM gene were twice as likely to develop breast cancer as those with the lowest levels.

On average, the blood tests were carried out three years before diagnosis. In some cases they pre-dated the discovery of breast cancer by up to 11 years.

The results were especially clear in blood samples from women under the age of 60.

Methylation is an “epigenetic” mechanism that allows genes to be affected by exposure to environmental factors such as hormones, radiation, alcohol, smoking or pollution.

Increasingly, epigenetic effects are being seen as important drivers of cancer.

Dr James Flanagan, of Imperial College London, who led the new research, said: “We know that genetic variation contributes to a person’s risk of disease.

Breast cancer

Breast cancer

“With this new study we can now also say that epigenetic variation, or differences in how genes are modified, also has a role.

“We hope that this research is just the beginning of our understanding about the epigenetic component of breast cancer risk and in the coming years we hope to find many more examples of genes that contribute to a person’s risk.

“The challenge will be how to incorporate all of this new information into the computer models that are currently used for individual risk prediction.”


The findings are published in the journal Cancer Research.

Why breast cancer risk should be linked to changes in a white blood cell gene remains an unanswered question.

The ATM gene has also been associated with a number of other cancers, including lymphoma and leukaemia.

Dr Flanagan, a Breast Cancer Campaign scientific fellow, added: “So far we have found alterations in one small region of a gene that appear to associate with risk of disease, and so the next step with this epigenetic research is a genome-wide approach to try and find all the associated genes.”

He said the research raised the possibility of a simple blood test to assess breast cancer risk at a very early stage.

Combined with other information, such as a family history of breast cancer, it could help identify women who might benefit from pre-emptive action.

Baroness Delyth Morgan, chief executive of Breast Cancer Campaign, said: “Dr Flanagan’s research into epigenetics is so exciting because it suggests that there is every possibility the risk of developing breast cancer could be decided many decades in advance.

“By piecing together how this happens, we can look at ways of preventing the disease and detecting it earlier to give people the best possible chance of survival.”

Prostate cancer rates increase

More than 40,000 men are being diagnosed with prostate cancer in the UK every year, figures show.

The number of new cases annually has almost trebled since 1989 when it stood at 14,000, according to the charity Cancer Research UK.

This increase is mainly due to greater use of the Prostate Specific Antigen (PSA) test, which measures levels of a chemical that is high when tumours are present.

But although the test has been credited with detecting some deadly cancer cases earlier, there are concerns it often causes ‘false alarms’.

Some two-thirds of men with raised PSA levels do not have prostate cancer. They are forced to undergo further unpleasant examinations to determine whether or not they have the illness.

And even these checks will not necessarily determine whether or not the cancer is aggressive and life-threatening.

It means that thousands of men will undergo surgery, chemotherapy or radiotherapy – which have debilitating side-effects – for cancers which may never have caused a problem.

Professor Malcolm Mason, of Cancer Research UK, said: ‘Accurately diagnosing and predicting the need for treatment of prostate cancer is fraught with difficulties and there is no escaping the fact that we need a better tool than PSA to help detect prostate cancers that actually need treating.

‘Men need to be counselled about the upsides and downsides of having a PSA test and the uncertainties that it can raise.

‘We urgently need to find better tests that tell us more about a man’s prostate cancer. Is the disease going to sit quietly in the background and never cause a problem or do we need to treat it aggressively?

Prostate cancer cells

Prostate cancer cells

‘If we can accurately answer these questions, we could spare thousands of men unnecessary treatment that can lead to side-effects like impotence and incontinence.’

Earlier this week American researchers claimed that surgery to remove prostate cancer is often ineffective. A study involving 731 patients found that those who had operations were only 3 per cent more likely still to be alive 12 years later compared to those who didn’t have treatment.

The researchers from the University of Minnesota said this increase could well be down to chance.


There is no national screening programme for prostate cancer in the UK but men who want a PSA test can request one from their GP.

Figures from Cancer Research UK also show that the death rate from prostate cancer has fallen by 11 per cent in the past ten years.

Prostate cancer is the second most common form of the illness in men after lung cancer. Although it leads to 10,000 deaths a year, in about 50 per cent of cases the cancer is growing so slowly it is not life-threatening.

The PSA test involves a sample of blood being taken and measured for levels of the prostate specific antigen.

But there are many reasons why readings can be high and it is not necessarily due to the presence of cancer.

A urine infection can lead to a positive result, for example. And some men have subsequently been diagnosed with cancer even though their PSA test was normal.

Earlier this year the NHS rationing body NICE controversially decided to reject a drug for advanced prostate cancer even though it can give patients precious extra months of life.

The watchdog ruled in February that abiraterone was too expensive for use in England at £35,000 per patient per year.