Posts Tagged ‘chris mccandless’

  1. Into the wild – National geographic review – Part 5

    April 18, 2012 by Neuschwanstein

    Many of McCandless’s Alaska critics point out that if the kid had had a map, he probably wouldn’t have died. The USGS quadrangle of the wilderness into which he ventured clearly indicates a gauging station with a cable across the Teklanika River, only a mile (two kilometers) downstream from the spot where McCandless, as he tried to hike out, was turned back by the swollen river. The map also locates three cabins in which he might have found emergency rations and supplies. As I read the manuscript of Into the Wild, I voiced the same stricture.

    Jon, however, had a compelling rejoinder. McCandless’s deliberate choice not to take a map, like his choice to carry only a ten-pound (five-kilogram) bag of rice into the wilderness, was, Jon argued, the very kind of upping the ante that we admired in other adventurers. Many landmarks in the history of exploration have come about when bold innovators chose not to use all the means their predecessors had counted on. McCandless’s deliberate self-limitation, in this view, was like Reinhold Messner climbing Everest without bottled oxygen, or Børge Ousland skiing across Antarctica without airdropped supplies or prelaid depots.

    Into the wild and Chris Mccandless

    Into the wild and Chris Mccandless

    A long autobiographical digression in the middle of Into the Wild recounts the author’s own solo expedition, at age 23, to a formidable Alaska mountain called the Devils Thumb. “People told me it was suicidal to try to hike up the Baird Glacier without a partner and a rope,” Jon pointed out. On his trek from the seacoast to the base of the mountain, Jon had to negotiate a fiendish icefall riddled with hidden crevasses. His only insurance was the absurd arrangement of a pair of ten-foot (three-meter) curtain rods strapped to his backpack in an X-formation, a contraption he hoped would catch the lips of any crevasse into which he might fall. “I got away with it. Chris didn’t. That’s the only difference.”


    Sean Penn had his own answer to the “Alaska take” on McCandless—the clueless hippie who got what he asked for. “One hundred and thirteen days,” Penn says, a terse declaration of McCandless’s achievement. “That’s more time than 99.9 percent of his critics have ever spent alone, even the Alaskans,” Penn elaborated. “It’s a long time. It’s done a minute, an hour, a day, a week, a month at a time. It’s got nothing to do with our judgment of his outdoor skills. It’s the strength of the commitment that counts.

    Into the wild - Christopher McCandless

    Into the wild - Christopher McCandless

    “As for those who want to nitpick, I start with the ones who tried to tell the world it wasn’t a moose.” On June 9, 1992, six weeks into his survival mission, McCandless recorded his greatest triumph in the journal he kept on the last two pages of a guidebook to Alaska plant lore. “MOOSE!” he wrote in capitals, double-underlined. He had shot the beast with his .22-caliber rifle.

    The two Alaskan hunters who stumbled upon McCandless’s body three months later read his diary, examined the bones of the great animal that still lay strewn about the camp, and declared it a caribou, not a moose. “The kid didn’t know what the hell he was doing up here,” one of the hunters later told Krakauer, and his buddy chimed in, “That told me right there he wasn’t no Alaskan.” So Krakauer reported in his magazine article. But the next summer, when he retraced McCandless’s route to his fatal camp on foot with Alaska wilderness veteran Roman Dial, they found the same bones. Dial instantly recognized them as those of a moose. Photos later developed from McCandless’s camera confirmed the animal’s identity. In his book, Krakauer corrected the “caribou” error.

    Says Penn, “There’s know-it-alls in every section of life.”


  2. Into the wild – National geographic review – Part 4

    April 16, 2012 by Neuschwanstein

    Sean Penn’s film subscribes wholeheartedly to Krakauer’s theory of Chris’s emotional wound, which informs some unsettling depictions of his upbringing. In a particularly disquieting scene, Walt (played by William Hurt) screams at and threatens to strike a cowering Billie (Marcia Gay Harden), while a preteen Carine, half-hidden by a door frame, watches in frozen terror. In general, Hurt’s Walt McCandless is a less than sympathetic figure—until near the end, when the father’s grief and sorrow over his lost son begin to redeem him.

    I asked Walt if the movie did justice to his family. “I won’t comment,” he answered, “until I see the final version.” The longer rough cut Penn had showed Walt and Billie some months before was, Penn admitted to me, easier on the McCandlesses than the shorter and nearly final version that I saw. Did Walt think Krakauer’s book was fair to the family? “Absolutely,” Walt answered without hesitation. A remarkable judgment, given how unblinkingly Krakauer lays out Walt’s betrayal of his wife and children.

    Penn not only met often with Carine as the film developed, but ended up involving her in a complex four-person “jam session” (his term) in San Francisco, as the director, Carine, Sharon Olds, and actress Jena Malone, who plays Carine, brainstormed to produce the extended voice-overs in Carine’s head that carry much of the expository burden of the film.

    If anything, those voice-overs intensify the picture of family dysfunction that lay at the heart of Chris’s anguish. In a pivotal scene, Carine’s disembodied monologue declares that the discovery of Walt’s infidelity reduced her and Chris to the status of “bastard children.” The contribution is Carine’s, not Krakauer’s.

    Into the wild & Chris Mccandless

    Into the wild & Chris Mccandless

    On the eve of the film’s release, Carine isn’t backing down. Over the phone I mentioned the importance of Walt’s disturbing secret to the story. “It was one of many,” she said, deadpan. For Carine, what matters most is that Penn’s film tell the truth about her brother. “People always think Chris was an idiot. But he wasn’t. He was such an amazing person, such a pure spirit.” It is crucial, she believes, that moviegoers understand that Chris had legitimate reasons for wanting to sever ties with his parents.


    But does the deceit that framed Chris’s childhood really explain this odd, driven, alienated youth? In a perceptive New York Times review that appeared when the book first came out, Thomas McNamee wrote of McCandless: “His contradictions, in retrospect, do not illumine but rather obscure his character. In death, he passes beyond the reach of mortal comprehension.”

    It is possible to find Chris McCandless unattractive and still love the book. Reading Jon’s manuscript, I thought McCandless’s grandiose condescension toward others was insufferable—especially in the long letter in which he lectures the 81-year-old man he met in southern California about how he’s wasting his life. And McCandless’s appropriation of snippets from Thoreau, Tolstoy, and Pasternak as mottoes for the true path struck me as predictably callow, the facile idealism of a greenhorn adventurer. But I was completely won over by the book, and not just because Jon is my good friend.

    Christopher mccandless

    Christopher mccandless

    Penn’s film sweeps away any doubts about the protagonist. Emile Hirsch is simply too good-looking, his Chris McCandless too appealing, for all but the most curmudgeonly to watch askance. In the few episodes Penn invents rather than adapts from the book, he spins rambunctious riffs, such as a rapids-running adventure in the Grand Canyon. In real life, McCandless spent a couple of days in the canyon, but his paddling amounted to a 400-mile (644-kilometer) flatwater journey by canoe below Lake Mead, from the Hoover Dam to the Sea of Cortez. Penn, however, puts McCandless in a kayak, making an illegal attempt to run Class IV waves, with Grand Canyon rangers in hot pursuit.

    For the whitewater scene, Penn dared Hirsch to perform his own stunts. Hirsch agreed only on the condition that Penn run the rapids first. “He just wanted to see that the thing was survivable,” the director told me. “Neither of us had ever run rapids before. But I was a surfer growing up, so I was comfortable
    in the water. I made it about three-quarters of the way down when the skirt came up and the water came in, and I got tanked. It was good for Emile to
    see how quick our safety guy came off the bank and grabbed ahold of me and pulled me away from the fangs.”

    Adds Hirsch: “As soon as I saw that the rapids didn’t completely take Sean down, I was ready to do it. Some people were shocked that I ran them, but no one was more shocked than me. Then I tried it the next day, just for fun, and of course I ate it.”