Tag Archives: new zealand

Livestock linked to cancers

Children who grow up on livestock farms are at an increased risk of developing a blood cancer later in life, a study has found.

Poultry farms carried the greatest risk, with those raised on one three times more likely to develop a blood cancer compared to those who had not.

Researchers at Massey University in New Zealand analysed the cause of death of 114,000 men and women between 1998 and 2003 who were resident in New Zealand. The researchers used death certificates to establish the occupations of the deceased and their parents.

More than 3,000 deaths were attributed to blood cancers such as leukaemia, multiple myeloma, and non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma.

The overall risk of developing a blood cancer was found to be 22 per cent higher for those who grew up on a livestock farm compared with those who had grown up elsewhere.

Livestock

Livestock

Growing up on poultry farm carried a three times higher risk of developing a blood cancer, but being raised on an arable farm conferred an almost 20 per cent lower risk.

However, working in crop farming as an adult increased the risk of a blood cancer by 50 per cent.

Working on a livestock farm as an adult also seemed to lessen the risk by 20 per cent, with the exception of beef cattle farming, where the risk was three times as high.


Previous studies suggested that farmers are at increased risk of blood cancers scientists said, but little research has looked at potential risk factors in early life.

The researcher suggested that exposure to particular types of viruses in childhood may affect the immune system’s response, leading to an increased risk of a blood cancer later in life.

But they also cautioned that further studies will be needed before a definitive cause and effect can be established.

The study is published online in the journal Occupational and Environmental Medicine.

Vegetarians have lower cancer rates

Vegetarians are generally less likely than meat eaters to develop cancer but this does not apply to all forms of the disease, a major study has found.

The study involving 60,000 people found those who followed a vegetarian diet developed notably fewer cancers of the blood, bladder and stomach.

But the apparently protective effect of vegetarian did not seem to stretch to bowel cancer, a major killer.

The study is published in the British Journal of Cancer.

Researchers from universities in the UK and New Zealand followed 61,566 British men and women. They included meat-eaters, those who ate fish but not meat, and those who ate neither meat nor fish.

Overall, their results suggested that while in the general population about 33 people in 100 will develop cancer during their lifetime, for those who do not eat meat that risk is reduced to about 29 in 100.

The researchers said they found marked differences between meat-eaters and vegetarians in the propensity to cancers of the lymph and the blood, with vegetarians just over half as likely to develop these forms of the disease.

In the case of multiple myeloma, a relatively rare cancer of the bone marrow, vegetarians were 75% less likely to develop the disease than meat-eaters.

The reduction was less notable for fish-eaters with these cancers. The reasons, researchers said, were unclear, but potential mechanisms could include viruses and mutation-causing compounds in meat – or alternatively that vegetables confer special protection.

There were also striking differences in rates of stomach cancer. Although the numbers of cases were small, fish-eaters and vegetarians were about a third as likely to develop the disease as meat-eaters.

Vegetarian diet

Vegetarian diet

Previous research has already implicated processed meats in stomach cancer, so these findings were not entirely surprising. It is thought N-nitroso compounds found in these meats may damage DNA, while the high temperatures they are cooked at may also produce carcinogens.

But the same reduction for vegetarians was not found with cancers of the bowel, one of the most common forms of the disease. The vegetarians in the group in fact had a slightly higher rate of cancers of the colon and the rectum, although not significantly so.

But the relative risk for fish-eaters and vegetarians of cervical cancer was twice that of meat-eaters. The number of cases was small, and could be down to chance but the researchers said it was possible that dietary factors influenced the virus behind cervical cancer.

Professor Tim Key, the lead author, said it was impossible to draw strong conclusions from this one single study.

“At the moment these findings are not strong enough to ask for particularly large changes in the diets of people following an average balanced diet.”


Vegetarian diets tend be lower in fat and higher in fibre, but they can require careful planning to ensure necessary protein and vitamins – notably B12, which is mainly derived from animal products – are taken in sufficient amounts.

A spokesperson for Cancer Research UK, which funded the research, said: “These interesting results add to the evidence that what we eat affects our chances of developing cancer. We know that eating a lot of red and processed meat increases the risk of stomach cancer.

“But the links between diet and cancer risk are complex and more research is needed to see how big a part diet plays and which specific dietary factors are most important.

Myeloma UK said this was the first data of its kind for the bone marrow cancer “and for that reason we are treating it with caution.

“Dietary advice to myeloma patients remains aligned with national guidance – that they should eat a healthy, balanced diet high in fibre, fruit and vegetables and low in saturated fat, salt and red and processed meat.”

Dr Panagiota Mitrou, Science and Research Programme Manager for the World Cancer Research Fund, said: “The suggestion that vegetarians might be at reduced risk of blood cancers is particularly interesting.

“However, this finding should be treated with caution since not much is known about the link between diet and these types of cancer. Further studies of vegetarians are needed before we can be confident this is actually the case.”